Water-Soluble Chiral Shift Reagents for High-Field NMR

There have been developed various methods of determining the enantiomeric purity and absolute configuration of chiral compounds using NMR, the most common and versatile analytical method in rganic chemistry. As one of these, there is the method to resolve enantiomer signals by using paramagnetic chiral lanthanide shift reagents. For example, the europium propylenediamine-tetraacetate complex (Eu-pdta) was reported to be useful for assigning the absolute configurations of α-amino acids and α-hydroxy acids in D₂O.¹⁾ However, it has been well known that lanthanide shift reagents generally have the drawback of causing line broadening, which is more serious when they are used in stronger magnetic field. Eu-pdta often caused heavy line broadening especially for the signals of α-amino acids even with 90 MHz ¹H NMR and it could not be used for these substrates in high-field NMR because of serious line broadening. In recent years, Kabuto and co-workers have demonstrated that the samarium complex (Sm-pdta, S0473 and S0474) is not as likely to cause line broadening in high-field NMR as Eu-pdta does and can be also used in determining absolute configurations of the α-amino acids.²⁾ Observation of the chemical shift nonequivalence for several protons enabled by the use of high-resolution NMR increases the reliability of the assignment as in modified Mosher method.

1. Resolution of the enantiomer signals of α−amino acids
NMR measurement is carried out on D₂O solutions of α-amino acids of pH 9~10, near the pKa of the substrates, where the best resolution is possible. The pH of the sample solution is adjusted with D₂O solutions of NaOD (~2M and ~0.2 M for ne adjustment, added with a micropipet), and a D₂O solution of DCl, if necessary. Use of the buer solutions containing anions such as phosphate and carbonate cannot be recommended because of their possible coordination to the lanthanide ion. When a sample solution contains both D-isomer and L-isomer, S0473 and S0474 is directly added in small amounts to the sample tube (when the concentration of the amino acid is 0.06 M, an amount of reagent is approximately 5~20 mol% of a substrate), and is dissolved by shaking the tube. Figure 1 shows an example of the NMR resolution of the enantiomer signals of valine utilizing the above procedure (¹H NMR: 400 MHz; [valine] = 0.06M; D/L ratio = 1/2.85; pH 9.4; [S0473]/[valine] = 0.2). Since S0473 itself also possesses several broad signals in the range of 2~4 ppm, it is not the appropriate reagent to use for determining the enantiomeric purity. However, as in the above example, when the enantiomer signals can be resolved at the baseline without overlapping with the signals of the reagent, then the approximate D/L ratio can be obtained from the ratio of the integration (D/L = 1/3.02 in the above case).

(B) Single enantiomer: Actual samples are often enantiopure. It is possible to determine the absolute configuration of a single enantiomer, by conducting the two separate measurements in the presence of S0473 and S0474 and comparing chemical shifts of the corresponding signals. This is because the chemical shifts of the signals of the enantiomer at hand in the presence of S0474 are the same as those of its enantiomer measured in the presence of S0473. The chemical shifts of the ¹H signals of amino acid are sensitive to concentration, temperature and pH, thus strict control of these conditions is required as well as controlling the equivalence of each reagent. The optimal procedures is to rst prepare two sample tubes containing equivalent amounts of a pH-adjusted sample solution. To one and the other tubes, add separately the same amount of D₂O solutions of S0473 and S0474 (pH adjusted to 8), whose concentrations are the same, using microsyringes to conduct the measurements.
This method has also been applied to α-hydroxy acids at pH ~5 and the relation for the side chain protons shown in Figure 2 was consistently observed.³⁾